Case Name : M/s Martin & Harris Private Limited & Anr vs Rajendra Mehta & Ors
Case Reference: (2022) 16 SCR 38 :
Neutral Citation:
Case Number: CA 4646/2022
Court: Supreme Court
Bench: 02
Coram: Indira Banerjee, JK Maheshwari
Date: 06.07.2022
Once there is decree for possession, the appellate court can fixed mesne profits to be paid to the person holding over the property (Paras 10, 11)
Refer also: Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd vs Federal Motors (P) Ltd, (2005) 1 SCC 705 : (2004) Supp 6 SCR 843 Appellate court has jurisdiction to compensate decree holder for loss by reason of delay in execution of decree Marshall Sons & Co vs Sahi Oretrans (P) Ltd, (1999) 2 SCC 325 State of Maharashtra vs Super Max International Pvt Ltd, (2009) 9 SCC 772 Affirming Atma Ram Properties (P) Ltd vs Federal Motors (P) Ltd
See also: CPC - Section 2(12)
PDF: Martin & Harris Private Limited vs Rajendra Mehta, (2022) 16 SCR 38.pdf