Case Name : HS Goutham vs Rama Murty & Anr Case Reference: (0000) 0 SCC 00 Case Number: CA No 1884/2010; CA 1845/2010 Court: Supreme Court Bench: 03 Coram: Ashok Bhushan, R Subhash Reddy, MR Shah (Author) Date: 12.02.2021
Refer also: Pushpa Devi Bhagat vs Rajinder Singh (2006) 5 SCC 566 :: non-maintainability of challenging a consent decree in view of Order XXIII rule 3 and section 96(3) CPC Chinnammal vs P Arumugham (1990) 1 SCC 513 :: reversal of decree will not affect auction purchaser who is not party to the decree
See also: CPC - Section 96 CPC - Order XXI rule 90 CPC - Order XXI rule 91 CPC - Order XXI rule 92 CPC - Order XXI rule 94 CPC - Order XXIII rule 3