Case Name : Jitendra Nath Mishra vs State of UP & Anr
Case Reference: (0000) 0 SCR 00 :
Neutral Citation:
Case Number: Crl A 978-2022
Court: Supreme Court
Bench: 02
Coram: Dipankar Datta (Author), Pankaj Mithal
Date: 02.06.2023
The court cannot act mechanically simply because the record implicates someone (Para 9) The court’s satisfaction has to be more than prima facie as formed at the stage of charge being framed, and short of satisfaction that the evidence, if unrebutted would lead to conviction
– Refer also: Hardeep Singh vs State of Punjab, (2014) 3 SCC 92
See also:
Act, Section
PDF: Jitendra Nath Mishra vs State of UP, Crl A 978-2022 (SC).pdf